Compliance console

Article 5 · Safety scan

Stop prohibited patterns before launch

Flag possible Article 5 conflicts early, so product and legal can intervene before release.

Safety-review flow showing safeguards, stop decisions, escalation, and evidence records

How the safety scan complements your audit

Use it with Quick Audit to separate documentation gaps from potentially prohibited use cases.

Pattern radar

Combines static analysis hints with policy keywords to flag modules that deserve human review — not a court verdict.

Article 5 lens

Mapped to the latest consolidated text — social scoring, manipulation, biometric surveillance, and emotion inference in sensitive contexts.

Evidence hooks

Each hit surfaces file paths, log excerpts, and recommended mitigations so engineering can patch or scope down features.

Governance bridge

Export bundles align with your integrity report and Annex IV narrative — one story for regulators and boards.

Legal handoff

Escalation prompts include jurisdiction notes and when to involve outside counsel or DPA consultation.

Continuous use

Re-run on every release candidate; prohibited signals can appear when models or integrations change.

Safety scan flow

DetectInspectEscalateResolve
Illustrative scan

Review required on sample workspace

Demo timestampSynthetic · CET

Modules reviewed

14

Flags for review

04

Heuristic confidence

High

Last runView integrity report

Article 5 prohibited practices

Illustrative findings — always validate with your counsel.

Social scoring
Critical risk

Parameters that evaluate trustworthiness from social behavior or personality proxies — often incompatible with fundamental rights safeguards.

Emotion recognition in workplaces
High risk

Systems inferring emotional states to monitor employees — Article 5(1)(f) triggers fast for productivity surveillance patterns.

Remote biometric ID
Prohibited case

Live biometric identification in publicly accessible spaces for law enforcement — narrow exceptions, heavy documentation.

Subliminal manipulation
Prohibited

Techniques beyond human perception meant to distort behavior — requires immediate product and legal escalation.

Technical deep-dive (sample)

Emotion recognition
Detection logic
[SYSTEM_LOG]: Initializing tensor analysis on Module 'HR_EVAL_PRO_V3'…
[WARNING]: FacialFeatureAnalyzer API reachable from worker runtime.
[RESULT]: Pattern consistent with workplace productivity surveillance.
[COMPLIANCE_NOTE]: Assess Article 5(1)(f) — emotion recognition in work/education contexts.
Codebase pointer
/src/analytics/worker_sentiment/facial_engine.pyL: 243–289
Suggested mitigation

Suspend facial metadata in production; route oversight workflows through human review before re-enabling any affective inference.

EU AI Act compliance engine (illustrative)Encrypted audit trail in production

Safety-review workflow for product and legal teams

Pair this scan with a full audit pass

Upload documentation in the Quick Audit, then cross-check prohibited heuristics — your board gets one coherent narrative.

Open quick audit

Operationalize remediation with owners

Connect flagged modules to your integrity report, assign engineering and legal leads, and track fixes through release.

Run documentation auditOpen last report